It's not Work-to-rule, though. The intent is different and actions taken under the term "Quiet Quitting" are only a subset of Work-to-rule. With Work to rule th

It's not Work-to-rule, though. The intent is different and actions taken under the term "Quiet Quitting" are only a subset of Work-to-rule. With Work to rule the intent is to negatively affect the business in the context of labor relations as an alternative to a strike. With quiet quitting the intent is not kill yourself by giving free labor to your employer. I find the whole discussion about "Quiet Quitting" absolutely absurd. "I'm hiring you to work 40 hours a week." "I accept." "I want you to work an extra 20 hours a week for free." "No." "What are you, 'Quiet Quitting' or something? You trying to go on strike?"