4 ms·
I like your comment! However, isn’t it plausible that the underlying population (or the distribution resulting from the ascertainment process) is structured in
by Myrmornis 4y ago
I like your comment! However, isn’t it plausible that the underlying population (or the distribution resulting from the ascertainment process) is structured in such a way that N=1000 might well have over-representation of certain subgroups, whereas N=10000 would be likely to have equal representation of subgroups?
- epistasis 4y agoIf your sampling strategy gets a biased group of 1000, it's almost certainly going to be biased in the same way as you pick 10,000. 1000 is plenty of individuals, the real concern is how they were chosen.
- danjoredd 4y agoThat was my concern. How many states did they test in the US? How many people from each state? LA and NYC are famous for being the cities every theater kid wants to live in, so if too many responses come from them, it seems obvious a huge portion want to be influencers. What about the midwest and south? Do they get the same results there?