> rather than explain how they work My interpretation was that LEOs who use Stingrays were required to sign NDAs and the company as well as one of the three-le

> rather than explain how they work My interpretation was that LEOs who use Stingrays were required to sign NDAs and the company as well as one of the three-letter-agencies that facilitated them didn’t want the information in public court records. It’s possible that there is something unconstitutional going on. It’s possible that having the technical specs in court would allow foreign terrorists (for example) to understand how they are being caught. Whatever it is, it seems incompatible with a democratic republic government. But the democratically elected representatives don’t seem interested in reigning it in.