In this case the trusted third party is the judge, who is reviewing the transaction and all associated communication. Judging-As-A-Service is an interesting co

In this case the trusted third party is the judge, who is reviewing the transaction and all associated communication. Judging-As-A-Service is an interesting concept, but in practice it's perhaps best left to the State. I don't see how you can add all-party anonymity without it being gamed. (Except possibly for the judge - which would might not be a bad thing because it could mitigate some of the corruption possible under the current system.)