3 ms·
You've got some of the detail wrong. He spent years hopping from job to job in different organisations. Some of them were NHS orgs, but others were charities.
by DanBC 4y ago
You've got some of the detail wrong.
He spent years hopping from job to job in different organisations. Some of them were NHS orgs, but others were charities. When his deception was discovered he left the job.
From your link: "the prosecution did not accept his claim that he had performed excellently during his time at various NHS bodies, saying he was rated as “unsatisfactory” in some of his job"
His original trial court documents aren't available, but his appeals against the confiscation orders are available:
https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Crim/2020/1055.html https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Crim/2020/1055.html
https://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKSC/2022/24.html https://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKSC/2022/24.html
And he did cause harm to those organisations.
- ectopod 4y agoThe prosecution always overstate their case. The actual judgment says: > Mr Andrewes has performed valuable services for the hospice and the two trusts in return for the net earnings and, if one were to focus solely on his performance of the services (before his fraud was uncovered), it would be hard to deny that the hospice and the two trusts were receiving full value in exchange for the salary paid.