4 ms·
0.72m/s? I hope you mean 0.72 milliseconds, which sounds about right for 44.1khz and 64 samples. Anyway, have you actually measured the _true_ latency from whe
by akx 4y ago
0.72m/s? I hope you mean 0.72 milliseconds, which sounds about right for 44.1khz and 64 samples.
Anyway, have you actually measured the _true_ latency from when your computer thinks it's sending out a signal and when it comes out of the speakers, and comparing it between a (good) USB interface and your preferred PCIe solution? After all, I have an old Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 gen1 and I too can technically crank the buffer size down to 64 in FL Studio and post about it on the internet...
- an_aparallel 4y agoi cant get 0.72ms from my laptop for example. and havent tested it in any official way - i cannot/have not ever got this type of performance on any other solutions before this. ive not tried thunderbolt before - indeed may be a good stand in for PCI as the comments mention below
- akx 4y agoI did my math again, and a latency (buffer size in milliseconds) of 0.72ms (0.072 s) with a buffer size of 64 samples means your sampling rate would have to be about 400 KHz (stereo). Are you sure it's not 7.2 milliseconds (to bring it to the usual range of 40 KHz sampling rate)?
- an_aparallel 4y agoSorry :) seeing the last comment on this thread reminded me the lowest buffer size i have available is 32 samples! apologies for the confusion