4 ms·
huh!?? don't they have amplitude to check how many users click that page? I click on that every day to see interesting projects when I'm bored and I have starre
by robertwt7 4y ago
huh!?? don't they have amplitude to check how many users click that page? I click on that every day to see interesting projects when I'm bored and I have starred so many cool projects from there..
the product people is insane, it's an insane decision
- bongobingo1 4y ago> huh!?? don't they have amplitude to check how many users click that page? Yes!?? Turns out the value is "not enough". I never click on that and have starred no cool projects from there. Seems like a totally reasonable product decision from my seat.
- throwwwaway23 4y ago> Seems like a totally reasonable product decision from my seat. The same probably applied to shutting down Google Reader. But it's still brought up a decade later, because it hit the "right" group of users. These changes spend a lot of the goodwill built by Github.
- metadaemon 4y agoSeems like a weird decision not to expose this in some capacity. It encourages external crawling and aggregation of content hosted on their site. Seeing that their search feature already produces abysmal results, it only further obfuscates public repositories.