3 ms·
Having a place to eat at home is not a luxury feature, unless the city has a population density that is high enough to support having a broad array of dining op
by jfim 4y ago
Having a place to eat at home is not a luxury feature, unless the city has a population density that is high enough to support having a broad array of dining options that are open for most of the day. Tokyo is one example of such a city, but having restaurants that are open 24x7 is not common at all in Europe.
- sokoloff 4y agoHaving a place to eat != having a dining room. Growing up (middle-class; both parents were teachers), we used our dining room to eat maybe 3 times a year. We ate around 1000 meals/year at the kitchen table and maybe 3 at the dining room table.