In general I agree, although the scale of software would mean there has to be some pretty significant flex in this sort of thing. The Twitter/Facebook/etc. of t

In general I agree, although the scale of software would mean there has to be some pretty significant flex in this sort of thing. The Twitter/Facebook/etc. of the world can afford having civil liability hang over their heads. But we don't want to live in a world where this kind of thing destroys the incredible software innovation our field has today, mostly from startups and small companies that eventually grow to the size of a Twitter. I feel similarly about the Section 230 issue - past a certain size, orgs are large enough to actually be able to be held to account on matters of speech on the platform - but defining that line is challenging and potentially very destructive.