3 ms·
> This is a very surprising choice. I believe that it's not too surprising if you know that most of their users are from HN. The HN comments on every telemetr
by throw10920 4y ago
> This is a very surprising choice.
I believe that it's not too surprising if you know that most of their users are from HN.
The HN comments on every telemetry-related post that I've seen have been violently, overwhelmingly, religiously against telemetry (not tracking - telemetry proper) in any form.
Even if those comments aren't representative of the views of the readers as a whole, if you're building a company and those comments are your biggest insight into your users' feelings - you're going to do stuff like this.
(and yes, it shouldn't have to be said that this inhibits security, but then again most of the anti-telemetry HN commentators are fine with that)
- account42 4y ago> and yes, it shouldn't have to be said that this inhibits security, but then again most of the anti-telemetry HN commentators are fine with that The end result of security at all costs is zero user agency so this is not at all surprising. Like anything, auto updates are a tradeoff that is neither without cost nor provides 100% protection.