3 ms·
> "Stable Diffusion was trained primarily on LAION-Aesthetics, a collection of subsets of the LAION 5B dataset, which is itself a subset of LAION-400M" Err, no
by zone411 4y ago
> "Stable Diffusion was trained primarily on LAION-Aesthetics, a collection of subsets of the LAION 5B dataset, which is itself a subset of LAION-400M"
Err, no? As you can tell by the name itself, the 5B dataset is larger.
> "Unlike autoencoder-based deepfake content, or the human recreations that can be achieved by Neural Radiance Fields (NeRF) and Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs), diffusion-based systems learn to generate images by adding noise"
This is confused. Diffusion is orthogonal to NeRF. For example, here is a paper that uses both: https://arxiv.org/abs/2112.12390 https://arxiv.org/abs/2112.12390
> "Within days of release, the open sourced Stable Diffusion code and weights were packaged into a free Windows executable"
That's not how it became popular.
> "Additionally, at the time of writing, Google Research has just released a similar system called DreamBooth, which likewise ‘tokenizes’ a desired element into a distinct ‘object’."
The approaches are actually very different. DreamBooth uses fine-tuning, unlike textual inversion.
- astrange 4y ago> This is confused. Diffusion is orthogonal to NeRF. Also, diffusion models learn to remove noise (guided by a description of the undiffused image), not add it. Though, it seems you don't have to use noise as the information destruction mechanism; blurring works, and I wonder if there isn't something better for animation.