Interesting finding. An immediate question that I would have was how did the language in the rejected proposals change? If we see more 'groundbreaking' adjectiv

Interesting finding. An immediate question that I would have was how did the language in the rejected proposals change? If we see more 'groundbreaking' adjectives today, this could mean different things: either the NHS has shifted towards preferring applications with more sensationalist language, or the authors have collectively shifted towards such language (or a mix of the two). Would be interesting to look at next (since they seem to be doing a series of papers on this topic).