3 ms·
This seems completely unrelated to the comment you're responding to. They were asking how the study figured out what the private opinions were, not about what s
by rimunroe 4y ago
This seems completely unrelated to the comment you're responding to. They were asking how the study figured out what the private opinions were, not about what sort of opinions they were hiding.
- A4ET8a8uTh0 4y agoI disagree. The question by parent was how it is determined. I merely provided several ways to determine the out-group as determined by the in-group. It is very relevant and, frankly, apt.
- pwinnski 4y agoQ: "How does A determine B?" A: "X doesn't like Y or Z for stupid reasons, so that's a thing that sucks and I don't like it." The levels of irrelevancy compound.
- rimunroe 4y agoNo, it's not. I think the thing they were asking could be rephrased as "How did the researchers figure out what private beliefs people held if those beliefs were private?" How does "Wrong hat. Wrong phrasing. Wrongthink." remotely answer that? Those are labels of particular types of actions/beliefs. They are not explanations of how researchers would find out something that people usually keep secret.
- A4ET8a8uTh0 4y agoI re-read it and you are right. I jumped to a conclusion based on what I thought I read. I would edit my comment, but I don't think I can anymore. Thank you ( and frankly apologize for wasting everyone's energy on correcting me on this )!