3 ms·
> Let's say that architecture licenses cost 25% of what chip licenses cost. Why would the architecture license be less than the off-the-shelf chip license? If
by ac29 4y ago
> Let's say that architecture licenses cost 25% of what chip licenses cost.
Why would the architecture license be less than the off-the-shelf chip license? If that were the case, I think youd see a lot more people designing cores.
- dev_tty01 4y ago> If that were the case, I think youd see a lot more people designing cores. Why? Designing fast and efficient cores is difficult and expensive. Almost certainly more expensive than licensing a pre-designed core. You've got to have a clear business need and the money (and expertise) to do it.