3 ms·

I think people who dismissed Ivermectin as horse-paste and misinformation, need to do some soul-searching.

by ta8645 4y ago

bckr 4y ago
I'm not going to take my crazy uncle's medical advice without a lot of evidence. That doesn't mean everything he says will always be wrong. That said, this is one study, and it may or may not be good evidence. It is interesting, though.
- washadjeffmad 4y ago
  I think they're referring to the people who sadly used others' hopes that this research would pan out as one of many loyalty tests for whether or not it was allowed to treat someone as sub-human.
- ta8645 4y ago
  Your uncle didn't pull that advice out of thin air. Respectable people first made the recommendation, he just chose to listen to them, rather than listening to the MSM. And it's not just that Covid zealots said, "I don't believe Ivermectin is helpful", they instead belittled and smugly derided anyone who even entertained the possibility that we should keep an open mind about it. People need to stop being so blindly faithful to the MSM narrative -- it isn't trustworthy. Your uncle understands that.
codefreeordie 4y ago
Not going to happen, though. Instead what will happen is that this will get censored and everyone involved in producing it unpersoned.
- fzeroracer 4y ago
  Who is going to censor it? The illuminati? The hidden global group of scientists that are working to censor Ivermectin for their evil plans? There's more to the world than just the US. Even if the US totally censored anything related to Ivermectin there are and have been more studies conducted across the world, including in places that have incorporated Ivermectin as part of the care routine. Most studies and research have shown little to no effect. But people are keen to point at a single (pre-print!) study and act like it's vindication before any sort of review.

3 ms·

I think people who dismissed Ivermectin as horse-paste and misinformation, need to do some soul-searching.

by ta8645 4y ago

I think people who dismissed Ivermectin as horse-paste and misinformation, need to do some soul-searching.

bckr 4y ago
I'm not going to take my crazy uncle's medical advice without a lot of evidence. That doesn't mean everything he says will always be wrong. That said, this is one study, and it may or may not be good evidence. It is interesting, though.
- washadjeffmad 4y ago
  I think they're referring to the people who sadly used others' hopes that this research would pan out as one of many loyalty tests for whether or not it was allowed to treat someone as sub-human.
- ta8645 4y ago
  Your uncle didn't pull that advice out of thin air. Respectable people first made the recommendation, he just chose to listen to them, rather than listening to the MSM. And it's not just that Covid zealots said, "I don't believe Ivermectin is helpful", they instead belittled and smugly derided anyone who even entertained the possibility that we should keep an open mind about it. People need to stop being so blindly faithful to the MSM narrative -- it isn't trustworthy. Your uncle understands that.
codefreeordie 4y ago
Not going to happen, though. Instead what will happen is that this will get censored and everyone involved in producing it unpersoned.
- fzeroracer 4y ago
  Who is going to censor it? The illuminati? The hidden global group of scientists that are working to censor Ivermectin for their evil plans? There's more to the world than just the US. Even if the US totally censored anything related to Ivermectin there are and have been more studies conducted across the world, including in places that have incorporated Ivermectin as part of the care routine. Most studies and research have shown little to no effect. But people are keen to point at a single (pre-print!) study and act like it's vindication before any sort of review.