3 ms·
Possibly because it's patented. There was a dispute with Creative Labs about the method.
by enqk 15y ago
Possibly because it's patented. There was a dispute with Creative Labs about the method.
- davyjones 15y agoWould you happen to know if this is Carmack's reverse or something totally unrelated? Edit: OK. I just googled and it indeed is Carmack's reverse.