3 ms·
Deviantart is effectively a filter to specific subset of digital art. It is reasonable to complain that SoundCloud isn't filling your "deviantart but for music"
by esrauch 4y ago
Deviantart is effectively a filter to specific subset of digital art. It is reasonable to complain that SoundCloud isn't filling your "deviantart but for music" pseudo -curation needs, but that's super different than saying digitalization has somehow uniquely 'ruined' music.
- throwaway4aday 4y agoI'm confused about what you're arguing for but this part: > Deviantart is effectively a filter to specific subset of digital art may be true since it is a community of artists that tend to have their own sub-genres that they move in but I believe the other poster was just giving it as the most popular example. Deviantart is really just the tip of the digital art iceberg, you can search and find a multitude of other sites hosting art communities as well as the sites of individual creators, YouTube and Twitch streams, Discord servers, etc.
- esrauch 4y agoIm arguing that all forms of art including both digital art and music is still "good" and none of it has been "ruined". The very first OP in this thread is arguing that music was ruined by the availability of digital music compared to music 100 years ago. I think this is just the standard "kids these days" griping. I was trying to say that digital art isn't special, in that most of it is also crap but it's not hard to find good stuff. Music is the same as that and has not been ruined.