3 ms·
Kiwi Farms has killed and swatted people and had resulted in many direct threats of violence to individuals. It's not really a slippery slope at all. All three
by killyourcar 4y ago
Kiwi Farms has killed and swatted people and had resulted in many direct threats of violence to individuals. It's not really a slippery slope at all. All three sites are way, way beyond the pale.
Calling it harassment is like calling the moon a "space rock" - technically true I guess, but missing the magnitude.
- MockObject 4y agoAs someone who fears and despises Kiwi Farms, I would be dishonest if I didn't recognize the slippery slope certainty that the bar of acceptability would decrease over the next few years.
- killyourcar 4y agoYou realize the fallacy here, right? Terminating commercial agreements with three origins of stochastic terrorism is not some ratchet towards new speak. It's just three cases where Cloudflare decided that sheltering terrorism wasn't in their best interest.
- trennep 4y ago
- phpisthebest 4y ago>stochastic terrorism stochastic terrorism is new speak itself, if redefining inaction to be action, is it redefining silence to be violence, it transitioning from a society focuses on first party liability (i.e am i only responsible for my own actions not the actions of others) to a collectivist mentality of not only am I responsible for my own actions but for the actions of everyone connected to me
- killyourcar 4y agoIt's not new speak. It's a more accurate set of words to describe what we used to call "lone wolves". Stochastic means random, statistically measurable but not predictable. The term "stochastic terrorism" means terror attacks like school shootings, swattings, and driving trucks into protestors that happen with a certain statistical likelihood, but whose individual events cannot be predicted.
- MockObject 4y agoThe phrase is the result of a slippery slope on the definition of "terrorism", which once referred to guerrilla groups driven by a religious or political ideology, to violent individuals lacking any ideology at all. But the slippery slope I had in mind, however, was that once Cloudflare submits to the pressure of Keffals against this odious site, that precedent will be set, and then another pressure group will emerge targeting a slightly less odious site, etc.
- phpisthebest 4y agoCitation. On the swatting I hope we are not believing MTG now.. that would be doubley ironic Also there is a big difference between actions of people that also happen to be members of a website and activity taking place on the website. I abhor third party liability In the case os 8chan and daily stormer they were banned for actions and content on the site. Not for actions of people that may be affiliated with the site as anonymous users
- killyourcar 4y agoThe London police arrested a trans activist and later apologized after she was targeted by kiwi farms. https://london.ctvnews.ca/doxed-transgender-activist-twitch-streamer-leaving-canada-due-to-ongoing-threats-1.6037531 https://london.ctvnews.ca/doxed-transgender-activist-twitch-... There's one citation. Byuu/Near, the author of the incredible bsnes project, was harassed to suicide by kiwi farms. https://kotaku.com/the-brilliant-snes-emulator-creator-known-as-near-has-d-1847182851 https://kotaku.com/the-brilliant-snes-emulator-creator-known... The site posted the video and manifesto of the Christchurch shooting. https://www.news.com.au/technology/online/website-kiwi-farms-refuses-to-surrender-data-linked-to-accused-christchurch-terrorist-brendan-tarrant/news-story/46d3c925ef84b24dde6194c42b3c2241 https://www.news.com.au/technology/online/website-kiwi-farms... So there, three different citations that, themselves link out to other news and reputable primary sources showing the site, including the owner of the site, are involved in stochastic terrorism and, quote, "the exploitation of the mentally handicapped for amusement".
- trennep 4y ago
- phpisthebest 4y ago>>The site posted the video and manifesto of the Christchurch shooting. Ok, and? I 100% disagree with the active censorship around current events we see every day, from police shootings to terrorism people should be forced to confront the raw reality of the world not a candy coated version put through the filters of main stream media. >So there, three different citations that, No those are claims that do not really have a fact based narrative behind them, further even if the claims are taken at face value you are blaming the site for actions of people off the site that may be members, 3d party liability. Going back to the 8Chan, and Daily Stormer they were banned for illegal content ON THE SITE, not because members of the site did things off that site. Posting mean or even offensive things on a website should never be a bannable event, and to the extent people are taking actions offsite, or offline to the point of direct harassment, swatting etc those INDIVIDUALS should be criminally prosecuted for their own actions