3 ms·
Fair enough, and I think your description that quality depends on an individual's own weighted dimensions of interest is spot on. But I'd also append what you
by 0thgen 4y ago
Fair enough, and I think your description that quality depends on an individual's own weighted dimensions of interest is spot on.
But I'd also append what you said with: human individuals probably share a lot the same dimensions of interest (and probably close to the same weights). Plus, those dimensions/weights would probably become more refined as you gain experience evaluating+generating art.
If there is such a thing as "quality", the key question would be whether professional art critics and experienced artists are any better at finding it.
- soneca 4y agoIt gets more tricky because, sometimes, the value of art comes precisely for negating what is commonly perceived as good quality for the majority of human individuals. And, after seeing that art, even the individual that used to give a lot of value for certain dimension of quality, realizes the value in a piece of art negating it.