Don't know what's there not to get, the text I quoted states this explicitly: "The licenses safeguarded Arm’s rights and expectations by prohibiting assignment

Don't know what's there not to get, the text I quoted states this explicitly: "The licenses safeguarded Arm’s rights and expectations by prohibiting assignment without Arm’s consent, regardless of whether a contemplated assignee had its own Arm licenses." ARM claims that they gave Nuvia a license with the condition to develop server-architecture, Qualcomm assumes that (the total sum of) their licenses allows them to use the architecture for whatever they want. ARM disagrees.