2 ms·
> I'm curious about why you would take such a contrarian, nay, even callous, stance? It might be because of actual experience in the aviation industry, rather
by jhugo 4y ago
> I'm curious about why you would take such a contrarian, nay, even callous, stance?
It might be because of actual experience in the aviation industry, rather than just experience reading articles about aviation incidents that amp up safety issues because that's what the public loves to read.
If you want to ground all aircraft which have returned to their departure point twice, you will be grounding every single aircraft older than a few years. So what exactly are you trying to say?
- ninjagoo 4y agoDo you actually have aviation industry experience? A commercial airframe with trip-aborting issues on multiple flights within a short timeframe implies severe maintenance process issues or design issues, or both. Gains in commercial flight safety are written in blood. JT610 is one case in point. Like I said, callous.