The article argues that building stuff it's complicated because some people want to ponder and analyze too much, hindering innovation and depriving people of go

The article argues that building stuff it's complicated because some people want to ponder and analyze too much, hindering innovation and depriving people of good things. I think you could very well take the opposite position: builders have inflicted plenty of bad on humanity - greenhouse gasses, lead in fuels, deforestation, and so on. Why shouldn't we infer that we need more pondering, analyzing, regulation, to save humanity from the next builder-created plague? I do not subscribe either of these position, but I think the article does nothing to sway me towards the first.