3 ms·
If you don't like S3 or DynamoDB then it'd be easy enough to sub them out for other things. Many cloud providers provide an S3-Compatible object-store protocol
by paranoidrobot 4y ago
If you don't like S3 or DynamoDB then it'd be easy enough to sub them out for other things.
Many cloud providers provide an S3-Compatible object-store protocol.
There's also open source projects self-hosting your own S3-Compatible object storage.
Swapping out DynamoDB for (say) Redis would also be fairly easy.
The source provided is a few hundred lines of pretty readable Golang.
While I'm not generally a fan of "If you don't like it, submit a PR to fix it" type responses - as a short example of how to implement something like this, it's a pretty decent starting point.
- nathants 4y agoi can confidently say that a series of encrypted git bundles could be stored anywhere. have them be monotonically increasing integers.