3 ms·
S3 is a cloud service provided by one company. It's not state of the art.
by hsn915 4y ago
S3 is a cloud service provided by one company. It's not state of the art.
- nathants 4y agothen who is sota and for what metrics? /giphy shutup and take my money
- paranoidrobot 4y agoIf you don't like S3 or DynamoDB then it'd be easy enough to sub them out for other things. Many cloud providers provide an S3-Compatible object-store protocol. There's also open source projects self-hosting your own S3-Compatible object storage. Swapping out DynamoDB for (say) Redis would also be fairly easy. The source provided is a few hundred lines of pretty readable Golang. While I'm not generally a fan of "If you don't like it, submit a PR to fix it" type responses - as a short example of how to implement something like this, it's a pretty decent starting point.
- nathants 4y agoi can confidently say that a series of encrypted git bundles could be stored anywhere. have them be monotonically increasing integers.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- dewey 4y ago> S3 is a cloud service provided by one company At this point it's basically a standard as many blob storage providers just implement the S3 API.