4 ms·
That's a terrible idea. It just pushes us further into the realm of no software ownership. It also makes gaming harder. The best implementation of Diablo 3 is
by 2muchcoffeeman 4y ago
That's a terrible idea. It just pushes us further into the realm of no software ownership. It also makes gaming harder.
The best implementation of Diablo 3 is the Switch version. Works offline. I can play it anywhere, any time without waiting for some network connection. And it supports local multiplayer with other Switch owners who own the game.
- vel0city 4y ago> It just pushes us further into the realm of no software ownership This is why I included the statement "our your console/PC at home" as well, for those who want to own the software but still want to stream. The software running remotely can still be on a machine you own running software you own. I often have a cheap laptop with me. It's trash for gaming but gets great battery life and is lightweight. Paired with my 5G phone or a decent internet connection, I can connect to my large gaming PC at home and stream any game I can play on that anywhere I go. I was recently on a trip 1,000 miles from home. I could stream my games with very little noticeable lag on the hotel's WiFi. Pings to home were ~40ms.
- nmfisher 4y agoWhile you're 100% right, don't throw the baby out with the bathwater. Streaming my own games from my PC to my own device with the Steam Link is great (network latency notwithstanding). I believe NVIDIA has an open-source equivalent too? I definitely want this to be a thing going forward - but as long as I still get to own everything.
- Fire-Dragon-DoL 4y agoIt also supports shared screen multiplayer, a feature nobody on PC was allowed to enjoy.