3 ms·

To be fair, we documented it happening in real time - https://austingwalters.com/covid-19-vaccine-deaths-being-coded-as-covid-19/ https://austingwalters.com/co

To be fair, we documented it happening in real time - https://austingwalters.com/covid-19-vaccine-deaths-being-coded-as-covid-19/ https://austingwalters.com/covid-19-vaccine-deaths-being-cod... UK government was counting gene therapy (“vaccine”) deaths as covid19 deaths. Which I mean, kinda? Regarding the fatalities, yes obviously part of them are from the gene therapy. The question was were they primarily from the gene therapy. https://austingwalters.com/covid19-vaccine-risks/ https://austingwalters.com/covid19-vaccine-risks/ It turns out all the predictions people were making about the gene therapy risks came to pass. I was credited by many of the “anti-vax” crowd for discovering the first real trend of this happening in the US cdc data (led to a lot of death threats and what not). After my blog and people picked it up, the CDC did a major edit to the data - https://austingwalters.com/changes-in-the-cdc-counts-of-deaths-by-state-and-select-causes/ https://austingwalters.com/changes-in-the-cdc-counts-of-deat... The only time I’d seen that in the 2 years I had been monitoring it (I tracked the data from 2019 - 2021). No idea why, but tracked what changed. Anyway, to your point. All of those were predicted by people who knew how the gene therapy worked (I did take bioengineering classes, and knew mRNA was highly experimental), as well as those monitoring data (where I primarily worked from). The data is frankly overwhelming in one area, but it’s difficult for people to admit what Obama put so well… https://twitter.com/disclosetv/status/1517239870875447297 https://twitter.com/disclosetv/status/1517239870875447297 It’s an experiment. We didn’t know the long term effects (still don’t), but the fact it caused heart damage (“rarely”) still means it probably happens a lot, but won’t be discovered for a while. That said Covid19 spike proteins are believed to be the cause; so the gene therapy and the disease both likely cause the heart damage. The thing with the gene therapy is the proteins were produced rapidly and we didn’t / don’t know how long it lasts or the rate. So it could cause more damage, imo evidence supports it was more damaging.

galangalalgol 4y ago
To what degree do you think improper administration played a roll? If the mrna was only delivered into muscle tissue and not the circulatory system, all the spike proteins and their damage would be isolated to the muscle tissue. Autoimmune effects would still be present, but would be with infection as well.
- lettergram 4y ago
  We didn't / don't even know the proper dosage for the vaccine... Personally, I stick to the research on mRNA technology prior to 2020 -- it doesn't work effectively and carries a lot of risk. Some basic unanswered questions: - How long does the mRNA last inside the cells? i.e. how long will your body produce spike proteins? - What's the appropriate quantity of proteins to produce a decent immune response? - In a batch of "vaccines" what's the quality and density of mRNA being injected into cells? - What are the long-term risks of creating proteins in this manner? (5, 10, 20 years out) - My wife was recommended the COVID19 vaccine when pregnant (in 2021) - what was the risk profile? It took a decade to learn that for the other vaccines (https://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/concerns/vaccines-during-pregnancy.html https://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/concerns/vaccines-during-p...) Just to point out how crazy that last point is... They recommend it on the CDC website (been recommending the vaccine since 2021): https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/recommendations/pregnancy.html https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/recommend... Yet, here's a paper published Aug 10, 2022: > Overall, studies monitoring people who have received covid-19 vaccines during pregnancy have not identified any pregnancy specific safety concerns. Additional information on non-mRNA vaccines, vaccination early in pregnancy, and longer term outcomes in infants are needed. To collect this information, vaccination during pregnancy must be prioritized in vaccine research. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35948352/ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35948352/ Here's another one from May 3, 2022: > Pregnant women were largely excluded from initial clinical trials investigating the safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines; however, they have since been included as part of the routine roll-out of these vaccines. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9061132/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9061132/ People / "Experts" know what they are doing and it's a massive experiment.
  - freshpots 4y ago
    And once again a comment where the "smartest person in the room" is making claims far out of their level of understanding. You're easily swayed by charlatans, use that to find your blind spots because they'll catch up to you. Probably already have.

galangalalgol 4y ago

To what degree do you think improper administration played a roll? If the mrna was only delivered into muscle tissue and not the circulatory system, all the spike proteins and their damage would be isolated to the muscle tissue. Autoimmune effects would still be present, but would be with infection as well.

lettergram 4y ago
We didn't / don't even know the proper dosage for the vaccine... Personally, I stick to the research on mRNA technology prior to 2020 -- it doesn't work effectively and carries a lot of risk. Some basic unanswered questions: - How long does the mRNA last inside the cells? i.e. how long will your body produce spike proteins? - What's the appropriate quantity of proteins to produce a decent immune response? - In a batch of "vaccines" what's the quality and density of mRNA being injected into cells? - What are the long-term risks of creating proteins in this manner? (5, 10, 20 years out) - My wife was recommended the COVID19 vaccine when pregnant (in 2021) - what was the risk profile? It took a decade to learn that for the other vaccines (https://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/concerns/vaccines-during-pregnancy.html https://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/concerns/vaccines-during-p...) Just to point out how crazy that last point is... They recommend it on the CDC website (been recommending the vaccine since 2021): https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/recommendations/pregnancy.html https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/recommend... Yet, here's a paper published Aug 10, 2022: > Overall, studies monitoring people who have received covid-19 vaccines during pregnancy have not identified any pregnancy specific safety concerns. Additional information on non-mRNA vaccines, vaccination early in pregnancy, and longer term outcomes in infants are needed. To collect this information, vaccination during pregnancy must be prioritized in vaccine research. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35948352/ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35948352/ Here's another one from May 3, 2022: > Pregnant women were largely excluded from initial clinical trials investigating the safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines; however, they have since been included as part of the routine roll-out of these vaccines. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9061132/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9061132/ People / "Experts" know what they are doing and it's a massive experiment.
- freshpots 4y ago
  And once again a comment where the "smartest person in the room" is making claims far out of their level of understanding. You're easily swayed by charlatans, use that to find your blind spots because they'll catch up to you. Probably already have.