4 ms·
Less optionality for a higher price is always inferior, I don't know any other adjective to define such poor arrangement
by Bubble_Pop_22 4y ago
Less optionality for a higher price is always inferior, I don't know any other adjective to define such poor arrangement
- ggm 4y agooh, you're reductionist? sure. its "inferior" totally inferior. Thats why nobody wants it. Or, do you acknowledge that whilst its absolutely "inferior" in your definition, its selling like hot cakes, worldwide, and so represents a good in itself which is not actually assessed by its relative worth to other things? You can't put a tent and a primus stove in a kelly bag. None the less, its immensely popular in a specific cohort of wealthy people who value it as a status symbol despite being inferior in every other way from a rucksack. And as I pointed out, EV take off at the lights as if somebody tied a burning rag to a cats tail. Hard to be reductionist about "inferior" if its actually better at something. or.. dare I say it, being less polluting? "less optionality for a higher price" is not actually inferior. "it depends" here's a theory. I am arguing with a low karma account which seeks to increase its karma by being provocative. I wonder.. is there a model where somehow other than not responding, we can stop that? probably not: I need to police my responses better.