5 ms·
I've always hoped that the US would restrict hardware exports under ITAR, as AI is absolutely a military weapon. I doubt, though, that they will restrict the e
by RichardCNormos 4y ago
I've always hoped that the US would restrict hardware exports under ITAR, as AI is absolutely a military weapon.
I doubt, though, that they will restrict the export of the raw material for creating AI: data.
- withinboredom 4y agoThey can’t even get their own companies to restrict the use of their citizen’s data lol.
- alphabetting 4y agoAllowing US companies to serve people relevant ads and allowing US companies to aid our number one adversary in developing the most potentially dangerous technology humans will every create are two very different things.
- soulofmischief 4y agoConvince me that mass surveillance in a genocidal police state is not one of the most potentially dangerous technologies humans will ever create.
- freeflight 4y ago> Allowing US companies to serve people relevant ads Except these companies do way more than just serve innocent ads, as the Snowden reveals have showed; They are complicit in way more than that.
- Bakary 4y agoAs someone from outside either country, neither the US nor China developing AI sounds particularly appealing.
- viraptor 4y agoThey can, but don't. Applying specific restrictions and switching from small fines to business-continuity-affecting rulings would solve the issue very quickly.
- PeterStuer 4y agoOr they don't because they can't? Those that would be inclined would never receive the funds and media support needed to get elected.
- kube-system 4y agoThey intentionally choose not to.
- petre 4y agoData can be stolen. It is in fact stolen all of the time with breaches and leaks.