Edit: I did the OPs homework. The claim about a legal liability difference is false per https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/08/30/false-claim-that-full

Edit: I did the OPs homework. The claim about a legal liability difference is false per https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/08/30/false-claim-that-fully-approved-pfizer-vaccine-lacks-liability-protection/ https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/08/30/false-cla.... In fact both the eua and fully approved version have the same protection due to the PREP act. OP please stop spreading false rumors that originated on Steve bannons war room. Now that you know the rumors you posted are false it would be appreciated if you go back to wherever you’ve posted the wrong info and post updates indicating the mistake. Original post: Please provide a citation for saying the fda approved version is not being distributed because it seems highly illogical that the full approval wouldn’t supersede the eua, with all the legal entailing implications, and the eua would cease to be valid. The fda has done some odd things in the past but a citation is needed on that claim that the approved version is not distributed and that both approvals coexist rather then the eua is superceded.