That's almost certainly true of Scalia. He who spearheaded the "federalism revolution" right up until a case about drugs came up, then he did an abrupt 180 on

That's almost certainly true of Scalia. He who spearheaded the "federalism revolution" right up until a case about drugs came up, then he did an abrupt 180 on that in Raich. But it's likely not true of Thomas. Is it true of the rest? Who knows. The liberals might well side with California's liberal government. Hard to say. Even if that would surprise you, Scalia's turn in Raich surprised many. It's hard to predict the SCOTUS' decisions.