As a reporter, Krebs failed to promptly disclose or retract when the source turned out to be the leak. That means my understanding of events was left incomplete

As a reporter, Krebs failed to promptly disclose or retract when the source turned out to be the leak. That means my understanding of events was left incomplete for longer than it should have been. So he wronged Ubiquity, which I don't particularily care for. He also wronged his readers, which I am party to. This late retraction is underwhelming and doesn't give me trust. As he seems to only have retracted after being forced to by Ubiquity, now what do I make of his stories where his targets don't have a legal team in his jurisdiction?