The right to speech is strong, at least in the United States, at least for now. Seeing how vital the Internet is for participation in society, it is my opinion

The right to speech is strong, at least in the United States, at least for now. Seeing how vital the Internet is for participation in society, it is my opinion that the baseline for "duty to serve" is that everyone has the right to a modicum of hosting and the ability to have their site accessible. That means a FQDN, SSL certificate, and network connectivity. Should it be a legal requirement? I'm not yet convinced. But I don't think CF is wrong to host orgs they morally oppose.