> I see more that as a consequence of a failure of the US to legislate hate speech. What’s considered “hate speech” is completely arbitrary and liable to chang

> I see more that as a consequence of a failure of the US to legislate hate speech. What’s considered “hate speech” is completely arbitrary and liable to change depending on who is in power. There’s untold “hate speech” against Christians, straight white males, wealthy people etc - where does it stop and why is criticizing one group of people “hate speech” and another not?