2 ms·

The Git dev model is _very_ different from cvs, svn, etc so the trade offs are less obvious. A lot of the benefit of git to me has always been the local develo

by olliej 4y ago

The Git dev model is _very_ different from cvs, svn, etc so the trade offs are less obvious. A lot of the benefit of git to me has always been the local development model, but the git-svn bridge made that largely transparent which I think lowered the pressure to change.

latchkey 4y ago
> The Git dev model is _very_ different from cvs, svn, etc so the trade offs are less obvious. I think that the difference makes the tradeoffs using anything other than git, more obvious. I even held out myself for a very long time with svn vs. git and once I switched... I kicked myself for not doing so earlier. But, like they said in the post... they did need a feature, which is core to svn (incrementing changelog ids) and a workaround in git. Minor in the grand scheme of things.