I do not appreciate the structure of the question. Half the front page has not been taken over by this question; moreover, no one is trotting out standard moral

I do not appreciate the structure of the question. Half the front page has not been taken over by this question; moreover, no one is trotting out standard morality (collective good) frameworks, eg an act is good/moral because of its final consequences, who does it, or its intention. Those are the main lines. And then there are many many gambits, to re(mis)use chess terminology. So: what are you asking, exactly?