5 ms·
>But KF literally drives people to suicide or calls in fake situations to get a SWAT team to ambush a home and in the hopes they shoot the people they are haras
by yanderekko 4y ago
>But KF literally drives people to suicide or calls in fake situations to get a SWAT team to ambush a home and in the hopes they shoot the people they are harassing.
Are you actually implying that Twitter mobs haven't done all of these things too? This is obviously wrong.
- schleck8 4y agoSo we should keep up Kiwifarms because something similar has happened on Twitter? Is that the logic? Instead of removing one of the evils let's keep them both up because fairness or something like that?
- yanderekko 4y agoThe logic is that we shouldn't use some sort of "one drop" thinking to characterize a platform as broadly evil based on its worst users.
- pjc50 4y agoThe problem here is that KF does not have "substantial noninfringing uses", it's all harassment even if most of it is non-fatal.
- squeaky-clean 4y ago> to characterize a platform as broadly evil based on its worst users. It's literally the purpose of KiwiFarms. It's all their users. Any forum board not dedicated to "lolcows" (what they call the people the harass, because they can be "milked for laughs") is in the off-topic section. I don't think you're aware of what KF is. It's not just a free-form social platform like Twitter. It's specifically for documenting, and scheming to harass lolcows.
- immibis 4y agoIt's not "one drop" thinking. It's 99.999% of the drops.
- squeaky-clean 4y agoTwitter doesn't exist solely to harass and cyberstalk people. KiwiFarms does. That's the difference.