Is it only the rate of production that makes a difference? If we hooked up our brains to computers that could turn our thoughts into pixels at a rate of thousan

Is it only the rate of production that makes a difference? If we hooked up our brains to computers that could turn our thoughts into pixels at a rate of thousands per day you'd see no issue? I don't think we should distinguish between meat and silicon neural networks. People should be able to use whichever neural network they see fit for a particular task. If a person has a right to observe and incorporate an image, so should a ML model operated by that person. Also, you may see a picture and imitate it. You may not copy or redistribute it directly. > How do you know this AI didn't just imitate one of the million pictures it saw I think the onus is on the copyright holder to prove a violation to a specific work. > who should it sue? I think the operator of the network is liable. If you distribute an image that is found to be in violation of a copyright, then you are liable no matter how you came about it.