3 ms·
There are real cases where this is true and it's the responsibility of a news organization to weigh the public good against the consequences of sharing informat
by colechristensen 4y ago
There are real cases where this is true and it's the responsibility of a news organization to weigh the public good against the consequences of sharing information and being very selective about what secrets to publish.
You should not want a news organization to err on either extreme by publishing literally everything they get their hands on (Wikileaks) or acting as a de facto arm of the state (state media outlet of choice).
I would argue that neither extreme count as journalists.
>I don't think that's much of a revelation.
Absolutely, they basically wouldn't be doing their job if they didn't ask. Asking is a lot different than many other tactics.
- hulitu 4y ago> You should not want a news organization to err on either extreme by ... acting as a de facto arm of the state (state media outlet of choice). But this is what they are actually doing. They saw some time ago that being in conflict with the state does not help revenue.