3 ms·
"Green" is a spent adjective at this point. Nuclear is zero carbon, but not renewable, and is a source of non dispatchable baseload. Solar and wind are both z
by danans 4y ago
"Green" is a spent adjective at this point.
Nuclear is zero carbon, but not renewable, and is a source of non dispatchable baseload.
Solar and wind are both zero carbon and renewable, but not dispatchable and not a baseload source.
Solar and wind plus storage are zero carbon, renewable, and also a source of dispatchable baseload.
- Brometheus 4y agoWe have minutenreserveleistung (MRL) using wind in Germany, but this is not the best solution :joy:
- blackoil 4y agoRenewable and green are orthogonal. Renewable is important for long term availability of the resource, which is not a practical constraint for nuclear.
- danans 4y ago> which is not a practical constraint for nuclear. It is very much a practical constraint for current nuclear reactors (whether traditional or SMR) whose uranium supply chains lead straight to problem zones [1]. Using conventionally mined uranium, traditional reactors would only provide 5 years of the world's electricity demand [2]. Seawater-extracted uranium could stretch into the thousands of years, but that is unproven at scale and cost. Similarly unproven are the fast breeder reactors needed to truly make the non-renewability of nuclear moot. 1. https://www.spglobal.com/commodityinsights/en/market-insights/blogs/electric-power/070722-global-nuclear-fuel-supply-chain-uranium-russia-ukraine-war https://www.spglobal.com/commodityinsights/en/market-insight... 2. https://phys.org/news/2011-05-nuclear-power-world-energy.html#:~:text=Uranium%20abundance%3A%20At%20the%20current,for%20less%20than%205%20years https://phys.org/news/2011-05-nuclear-power-world-energy.htm....