2 ms·
Yes, I nitpicked because OP was speaking in absolutes. The larger point that “technology destroys jobs” is not novel or interesting. But to know that these job
by fingerlocks 4y ago
Yes, I nitpicked because OP was speaking in absolutes. The larger point that “technology destroys jobs” is not novel or interesting.
But to know that these jobs still exist, and might be more common than you realize, now that’s interesting!
- throwawaylinux 4y ago> Yes, I nitpicked because OP was speaking in absolutes. The larger point that “technology destroys jobs” is not novel or interesting. That wasn't the larger point. And if that was your issue, why didn't you ask about it so I could have explained it to you better? The point was that art as a profession and a commercial venture is not special or different from any other industry with respect to automation.