3 ms·
> I support ButtFlare here - they should act as a utility, not as an arbiter of content. So then advocate for them to actually be a utility. Right now they get
by phillipcarter 4y ago
> I support ButtFlare here - they should act as a utility, not as an arbiter of content.
So then advocate for them to actually be a utility. Right now they get to benefit from being treated like one, but not being held to the same legal standard of an actual utility.
- thematrixturtle 4y agoLeft your cloud2butt extension on by any chance?
- phillipcarter 4y agoAlways.
- Dracophoenix 4y agoBeing a utility doesn't make them any less of a de facto arbiter or any better of a company. Utilities can suck too. And, worse, they do it with the political backing of the state.
- phillipcarter 4y agoIndeed, it doesn't! But having much stricter legal obligations means there are more tools to hold their feet to the fire.
- abigail95 4y agohold their feet to the fire to do what? provide more network protection to objectionable websites? i'm not getting the idea, reading this thread, that is what people here want.