It's not a good comparison. A better comparison is like saying AI text generation bots will replace authors, or that AI drug testing will replace drug developm

It's not a good comparison. A better comparison is like saying AI text generation bots will replace authors, or that AI drug testing will replace drug development - which clearly isn't the case. The core issue is that people with no idea what the creative fields offer are throwing their hat in with what they think is going to happen. People with experience are saying the opposite because they know better. At best, this will remove those websites where you can pay $5 for "a designer" to make you "an image" - is this a loss though? Such things have never been a threat to creative fields.