The point of the article was that the original "study" it discusses was biased and incorrect. He suggested ways that the study could be improved. Unfortunately,

The point of the article was that the original "study" it discusses was biased and incorrect. He suggested ways that the study could be improved. Unfortunately, the article doesn't present data for these measurements. Your posts have not added nor taken anything away this article. Your parroting the popular opinion based on anecdotal facts is not helpful to anyone.