4 ms·
I think he could have pointed out the error in a tweet and I would have been fine if someone had linked such a tweet. Having read a little more I was expecting
by onemoreact 15y ago
I think he could have pointed out the error in a tweet and I would have been fine if someone had linked such a tweet.
Having read a little more I was expecting a little more. And sure he presented a new idea, but it's a well worn argument with plenty of evidence on both sides of the issue. When you break it down there are two arguments one of which was well supported and another that was left hanging. And leaving me hanging makes me feel that the first point was simply a straw man being torn down which left a bitter taste in my mouth.
PS: I have little skin in this game, Edit: I suspect Android may reach parity with Apple, but this article did little but annoy me and convince me that we are far from that parity. aka years vs months.
- esmevane 15y agoI don't know if android and iOS will be matched any time soon. One day, cars could fly (more frequently than they do now). I'm with you on the essence of the article being worth a blurb or a micropost of some sort. It was an objection article, without any substantiative data. I think my root motivation here was the desire to see that substantiative data, which I think another poster in this comments has provided. The numbers ARE pretty low in comparison by that data point.