3 ms·
This is very simple: if you believe VPN is a safety for protecting your privacy and your data, you don't want to put all of that in the hands of someone who wil
by icare_1er 4y ago
This is very simple: if you believe VPN is a safety for protecting your privacy and your data, you don't want to put all of that in the hands of someone who will submit not to governments; not to a tribunal... but to a mere Twitter account with 95 followers.
- mintythoughts 4y agolol the people making the marketing decisions probably aren’t the people making decisions about legal data requests
- icare_1er 4y ago"probably" Or probably not. As far as I am concerned, I judge a company as a block, any of its employees/teams/departments speaks for the whole company, end of the story. And for the topic we're discussing, the company easily caves in and is weak so I am not going to rely on them for anything related to privacy or safeguarding data.
- IanCal 4y agoPrivacy and where someone advertises are dramatically different things. If they'd handed over data to those twitter accounts I'd agree with you. This kind of thing I think pushes the needle the other way. It shows a company extremely concerned about their image, when their core argument is about trust and privacy.