3 ms·
My position is perfectly logically consistent. Art is distilled human experience and human emotions emerging in a particular context after a chain of events. No
by trention 4y ago
My position is perfectly logically consistent. Art is distilled human experience and human emotions emerging in a particular context after a chain of events. None of this is true of AI "art".
What is not logically consistent is to claim that a black box utilizing statistical relationships between pixels in a giant dataset is an "artist" and that its products create "value".
The compiler is not a programmer, AI can never be an artist.
- varnaud 4y agoThe chain of events: Step 1: Tweak settings and type text Step 2: Look at the result Step 3: If you like the result, go to step 4, otherwise go back to step 1. Step 4: Save and share the result Feels like art to me. Ultimately it's still a human using a tool to create art. For me AI art is just the name of the art style.
- trention 4y agoBy that logic, a google image search + sharing results you like is also art. But it really isn't. At best it's curation.