4 ms·

>In what world is “Heavy + slow” a nefarious practice? In M$ world and Apple's world( XCode). 2022's version was the first one to do a 64-bit release and becam

>In what world is “Heavy + slow” a nefarious practice? In M$ world and Apple's world( XCode). 2022's version was the first one to do a 64-bit release and became news titled - "awesome!", "Woah!", "amazing!", etc. [0] VStudio had nothing unique to it that the Rider din't have, but corporates and developers loved it because they could compensate by throwing some costly hardware and I must point out that it is usually from Intel that M$ is in monopoly in consumer and enterprise market. Apple is just the same, but it gets away being close to the *nix world. "performance improvements and bug smashes" are just fodder for despair that masquerades as hope, which could have been done away with long ago. Users report them and even showed what exactly could be done down to bits and bytes, but these thigs sleep there for a decade. All you need to do is create a developer account and search "for 10 years" or "since a decade" in their forums. Frustrations pour out and in galore. "Don't be evil" - Google "Be devil and also pull your greatest trick" - M$ [0]https://stackoverflow.com/questions/2516436/visual-studio-64-bit https://stackoverflow.com/questions/2516436/visual-studio-64...

nindalf 4y ago
> because they could compensate by throwing some costly hardware and I must point out that it is usually from Intel that M$ is in monopoly in consumer and enterprise market. It’s unclear what you mean by this sentence. Are you saying Microsoft somehow benefits if we buy more Intel? So there’s a developer at Microsoft who wrote in their performance review “yes, I’m proud to say that I worsened the experience for Microsoft users, but it’s ok because that leads to sales for Intel”. Leaving aside that Intel is playing catch up in the processor market now, do you actually believe this? Anyone else reading this comment - this is why it’s impossible for me to take these folks seriously. They concoct these conspiracy theories that are only slightly more logical than flat earth.

nindalf 4y ago

> because they could compensate by throwing some costly hardware and I must point out that it is usually from Intel that M$ is in monopoly in consumer and enterprise market. It’s unclear what you mean by this sentence. Are you saying Microsoft somehow benefits if we buy more Intel? So there’s a developer at Microsoft who wrote in their performance review “yes, I’m proud to say that I worsened the experience for Microsoft users, but it’s ok because that leads to sales for Intel”. Leaving aside that Intel is playing catch up in the processor market now, do you actually believe this? Anyone else reading this comment - this is why it’s impossible for me to take these folks seriously. They concoct these conspiracy theories that are only slightly more logical than flat earth.