3 ms·
It can gives significant reduction sometimes because sometimes the input is "uncompressed" (which png supports), basically just like bmp. In general, I don't f
by thrdbndndn 4y ago
It can gives significant reduction sometimes because sometimes the input is "uncompressed" (which png supports), basically just like bmp.
In general, I don't find optimizing png beyond the default compression level worth it for typical personal use. But can see why they are useful if you're hosting things.
- asicsp 4y agoYeah, I'm using the lossy compression for blog posts. And, I was comparing `pngquant` to `oxipng` sizes (not the default png output I get after creating a poster). For example, 70KB with oxipng changes to 32KB with pngquant at 99% quality level. This depends on the image of course, but most of the time I do see significant savings.