3 ms·
Sounds like a hopeless protectionist endeavor, reminiscent of cartoonish Keynesian economics busywork: "We can't permit development of adding machines, what abo
by sennight 4y ago
Sounds like a hopeless protectionist endeavor, reminiscent of cartoonish Keynesian economics busywork: "We can't permit development of adding machines, what about all the hard work people have put into memorizing multiplication tables?!".
- nbzso 4y agoNo. Sounds like common sense. Not popular in the tech community nowadays. Data is the new "petrol". Since when the petrol is free of charge? People in mass are clueless. If you use my "human" accomplishments as an energy source, you must pay me. Period.
- sennight 4y ago> Since when the petrol is free of charge? At around the same time that it actually resembles "the new data", or maybe even shares a single quality with it? Being a physical object, it is bound by physical properties... like scarcity. Data, being an abstract concept, suffers no such constraint. Same story for whatever artistic technique you've imagined to be not only valuable, but novel to all of human experience and wholly owned by you and you alone. Your valuation of your worth and that of your labor is laughably overinflated and the market is telling you so. Period.
- nbzso 4y ago> Your valuation of your worth and that of your labor is laughably overinflated and the market is telling you so. Period. Good luck with that. :) Everything around you is a product of Intellectual Property. Your logic is laughably naive. The market will shift to AI generated nonsense moved by greed and over-optimization. People will reject this en masse. And there is one big undeniable reason: Human Psychology.