4 ms·
It will be hard to tell whether an image was created by a “human creative process” or AI. Will the same image be legal if a human made it but not if it was cre
by nilsbunger 4y ago
It will be hard to tell whether an image was created by a “human creative process” or AI.
Will the same image be legal if a human made it but not if it was created by Stable Diffusion? How will someone even know, short of a legal discovery process?
- ipaddr 4y agoThe watermark.
- LewisVerstappen 4y agoIt's extremely trivial to remove the watermark.
- simonw 4y agoWhat watermark? The model is open source and free for people to make their own modifications. I don't see how any watermark can survive in those conditions.
- jyrkesh 4y agohttps://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32573523 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32573523 All this is super, super interesting to me. I don't think anybody really knows how it will play out, there's a lot of good arguments floating around.
- ipaddr 4y agoAll images from stable diffusion have an invisible watermark unless you modify the source to remove it.
- throwaway1851 4y agoI wouldn’t be too surprised if tools are created to quantify the amount of a source image that’s gone into an output image.
- tommos0 4y agoSomeone will create some AI that detects if the image contains stuff from their copyrighted portfolio
- PeterisP 4y agoA legal discovery process is a perfectly reasonable (and common) way to determine if something is legal, and yes, it's completely unsurprising that the exact same outcome might be legal or illegal depending on how it was obtained (or even with what intent the actions were done), legality takes these things into account.